H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 7-1

Anne Smith holds a 7–1 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 4–1 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1991 Chicago round of 32 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main-draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-2 7-6 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Feb 14, 1991* R32 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anne Smith 7-6 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Nov 8, 1990* R32 Worcester Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anne Smith 7-5 6-1 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Oct 6, 1988* R32 New Orleans WTA 250 Hard
Anne Smith 6-2 6-4 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Nov 6, 1987* R16 Little Rock WTA 250 Hard
Anne Smith 6-3 7-5 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Oct 2, 1987* R16 New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 4-6 7-6 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Jan 7, 1982* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Anne Smith 6-3 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Nov 20, 1981* R16 Perth 2 WTA 250 Grass
Mary Lou Piatek 6-3 6-3 Anne Smith Match data Mar 13, 1980* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,053 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,938 157 207 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Anne Smith Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,633 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,547 0 0
1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,850 0 2 1980 20–13 60.6% — 1,762 0 0
1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,870 0 2 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,874 0 1
1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,938 0 2 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,793 0 1
1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,900 0 2 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,899 0 2 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,704 0 2
1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,875 0 2 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,901 0 3 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2
1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,719 0 3 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,786 0 3 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,778 0 3 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2
1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,851 0 3 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2
1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2
1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
— — — — — — — 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Anne Smith Mary Lou Piatek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2%
1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 53 61 114 46.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Anne Smith Mary Lou Piatek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1977 1634 138.5 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.55 1978 1499 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
1978 1776 139.7 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.91 1979 1547 118.3 — — — — +98 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.12
1979 1850 152.8 — — — — -10 -187 -233 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.72 1980 1763 137.4 — — — — +9 -186 — 57.7% +0.61 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.65
1980 1870 145.4 — — — — -29 -181 -221 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -5.91 1981 1875 146.3 — — — — +65 -198 -301 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 100.9 -2.75
1981 1938 153.9 — — — — +39 -233 -158 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 1982 1794 142.2 — — — — +59 -196 -212 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 -0.89
1982 1901 157.3 — — — — +44 -218 -38 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 -1.41 1983 1722 143.9 — — — — +55 -87 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -4.11
1983 1900 140.2 — — — — +41 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.39 1984 1704 128.6 — — — — -14 — -70 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 -0.88
1984 1876 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.30 1985 1678 113.9 — — — — -28 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +1.98
1985 1902 131.2 — — — — — -250 -5 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.35 1986 1619 111.1 — — — — +10 — -25 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.45
1986 1719 121.0 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.84 1987 1595 117.3 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.12
1987 1786 132.0 — — — — +8 — +61 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.59 1988 1543 116.2 — — — — +33 -44 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.58
1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.73 1989 1593 121.4 — — — — +35 -117 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.73
1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -5 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.05 1990 1612 125.3 — — — — +7 -86 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44
1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -7 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 1991 1630 119.5 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69
1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -21 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
Career 2053 154.5 — — — — +14 -191 -74 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.2 -4.48 Career 1938 136.6 — — — — +26 -129 -156 44.3% -0.42 47–56 (46%) 21–34 (38%) 92.7 -2.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.