H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Smith vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-2
Patty Fendick holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1991 Oklahoma third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1991* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-1 7-6 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1990* | Chicago | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Patty Fendick | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 7-5 7-5 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |