H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Smith vs Petra Delhees Jauch H2H: 1-0
Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Delhees Jauch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1982 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1982* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-4 | Petra Delhees Jauch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petra Delhees Jauch | — | — | — | 1,720 | 69 | 91 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anne Smith | Petra Delhees Jauch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |