H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 2-2

Anne Smith and Regina Marsikova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Regina Marsikova leads 2–0 on clay, while Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1979 Richmond round of 16 6-1 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-1 3-6 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 17, 1979* R16 Richmond WTA 250 Carpet
Regina Marsikova 6-3 7-6 Anne Smith Match data Jun 5, 1979* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Regina Marsikova 6-4 6-4 Anne Smith Match data Apr 13, 1979* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Anne Smith 6-2 6-1 Regina Marsikova Match data Oct 6, 1978* R16 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,034 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Smith Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,909 0 8
19 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,937 0 12
21 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,899 0 14
22 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,996 0 15
23 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,763 0 15
27 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,719 0 15
28 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,540 0 15
31 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Smith Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Smith Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.09
17 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53 1976 1748 142.4 — — — — -178 +62 -176 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.38
18 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88 1977 1909 143.6 — — — — -347 +113 -243 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.8 +1.24
19 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77 1978 1953 157.8 — — — — -98 +117 -133 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.5 -6.24
20 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69 1979 1937 147.6 — — — — -80 +154 -90 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.91
21 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 1980 1899 147.5 — — — — -23 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.21
22 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82 1981 1997 159.3 — — — — -116 +182 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -6.03
23 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98 1985 1764 131.5 — — — — +4 +295 -77 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.30
27 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68 1986 1720 126.9 — — — — +1 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.11
28 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68 1987 1672 129.0 — — — — +36 +92 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.58
29 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +87 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.28
31 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21 — 2034 150.4 — — — — -68 +139 -140 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.