H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Smith vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 2-2
Anne Smith and Regina Marsikova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Regina Marsikova leads 2–0 on clay, while Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1979 Richmond fourth round 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1979* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1979* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-3 7-6 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1979* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-4 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1978* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-2 6-1 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |