H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Smith vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 1-2
Stacy Margolin holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stacy Margolin leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stacy Margolin won the 1981 Dallas third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1981* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-4 6-3 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1980* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-2 6-1 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1978* | Salibury | WTA 250 | QF | — | Anne Smith | 6-3 7-5 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |