H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-1

Anne Smith and Tina Mochizuki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anne Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1988 Los Angeles round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-1 6-4 Tina Mochizuki Match data Aug 10, 1988* R64 Los Angeles Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Tina Mochizuki 4-6 6-2 6-2 Anne Smith Match data Mar 12, 1986* R64 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Smith Tina Mochizuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
17 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0
18 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0
19 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0
20 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0
21 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
26 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0
28 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1
29 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1
30 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1
31 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Smith Tina Mochizuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Smith Tina Mochizuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55
17 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38
18 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
19 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65
20 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
21 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
26 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
28 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
29 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68
30 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
31 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21 — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.