H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Zenda Liess H2H: 1-0

Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Zenda Liess in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1979 Tampa round of 32 6-7 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Zenda Liess
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-7 6-1 6-1 Zenda Liess Match data Oct 25, 1979* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Zenda Liess — — — 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Smith Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,619 0 0
18 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,742 0 0
19 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,662 0 0
20 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
21 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Smith Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
18 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% — 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Smith Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.30
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +28 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.18
17 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53 1977 1619 124.4 — — — — -92 +63 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88 1978 1743 135.7 — — — — -78 -37 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77 1979 1662 120.1 — — — — -29 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.45
20 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69 1980 1610 95.3 — — — — -77 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
21 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21 — 1744 131.4 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.