H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Annette Van Zyl vs Joyce Williams H2H: 1-3
Joyce Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Annette Van Zyl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joyce Williams leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Joyce Williams won the 1970 Fulham quarterfinal 2-6 9-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1970* | Fulham | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Joyce Williams | 2-6 9-7 6-4 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1969* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Joyce Williams | 6-3 2-6 6-0 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1969* | Torquay | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Joyce Williams | (w/o) | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| May 3, 1968* | Hurlingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Annette Van Zyl | 7-5 6-2 | Joyce Williams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annette Van Zyl | — | — | — | 1,900 | 107 | 46 | 69.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Joyce Williams | — | — | — | 1,966 | 188 | 88 | 68.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annette Van Zyl | Joyce Williams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1968 | 49–12 | 80.3% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1969 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 46–17 | 73.0% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1970 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 23–12 | 65.7% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 30–8 | 78.9% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1974 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1975 | 11–1 | 91.7% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 1976 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 11 |