H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Annette Van Zyl vs Patricia Walkden H2H: 2-2
Annette Van Zyl and Patricia Walkden are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Annette Van Zyl won the 1970 Johannesburg fourth round 7-9 8-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1970* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Annette Van Zyl | 7-9 8-6 6-0 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1969* | Cape Town | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Patricia Walkden | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1968* | Durban | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Annette Van Zyl | 8-6 6-2 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1968* | Cape Town | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Patricia Walkden | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annette Van Zyl | — | — | — | 1,900 | 107 | 46 | 69.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Patricia Walkden | — | — | — | 1,941 | 218 | 104 | 67.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annette Van Zyl | Patricia Walkden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 48–23 | 67.6% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 53–18 | 74.6% | — | 1,879 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1968 | 49–12 | 80.3% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 49–24 | 67.1% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1969 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 9–3 | 75.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1970 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 31–17 | 64.6% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1974 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 11–1 | 91.7% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |