H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Annika Beck vs Teliana Pereira H2H: 2-3
Teliana Pereira holds a 3–2 lead over Annika Beck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Teliana Pereira leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Annika Beck won the 2016 Nurnberg third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 37
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2016* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Annika Beck | 6-0 6-4 | Teliana Pereira | Match data |
| May 11, 2016* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Teliana Pereira | 6-4 7-6(6) | Annika Beck | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2016* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Teliana Pereira | 6-3 6-1 | Annika Beck | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2015* | Florianopolis | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Teliana Pereira | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Annika Beck | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2015* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Annika Beck | 5-2 (ret.) | Teliana Pereira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Teliana Pereira | #1,102 | #43 | 1,136 | 1,643 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annika Beck | Teliana Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #206 | 1,478 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 |