H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Antonella Serra Zanetti vs Erika De Lone H2H: 0-1
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Antonella Serra Zanetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 2002 Memphis third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2002* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-2 6-4 | Antonella Serra Zanetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonella Serra Zanetti | #963 | #60 | 536 | 1,578 | 49 | 92 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonella Serra Zanetti | Erika De Lone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #92 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #111 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #100 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #322 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |