H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Antonella Serra Zanetti vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Antonella Serra Zanetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 US Open second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-1 | Antonella Serra Zanetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonella Serra Zanetti | #963 | #60 | 536 | 1,578 | 49 | 92 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonella Serra Zanetti | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2002 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #92 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #111 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #100 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2006 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #322 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |