H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 0-4
Anna Smashnova holds a 4–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anna Smashnova leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 2005 Palermo third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2005* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-3 6-2 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2005* | Modena | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-4 6-0 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2005* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 6-0 6-0 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2004* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Anna Smashnova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 |