H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Conchita Martínez Granados H2H: 0-1
Conchita Martínez Granados holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez Granados leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez Granados won the 2005 Bogota third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Conchita Martínez Granados | 6-2 6-2 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Conchita Martínez Granados | #587 | #66 | 538 | 1,579 | 29 | 48 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Conchita Martínez Granados | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #110 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #204 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #150 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #321 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |