H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 0-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2004 Miami Open round of 128 7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arantxa Parra Santonja
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #46 7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 Arantxa Parra Santonja #58 Match data Mar 25, 2004* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arantxa Parra Santonja #858 #46 1,231 1,625 71 120 37.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arantxa Parra Santonja Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2003 10–11 47.6% #67 1,591 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2004 17–26 39.5% #70 1,590 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2005 13–21 38.2% #109 1,530 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2006 1–9 10.0% #175 1,427 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2007 0–2 0.0% #366 1,413 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2008 1–2 33.3% #299 1,420 0 0 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2009 2–8 20.0% #93 1,407 0 0 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2010 17–18 48.6% #65 1,571 0 0 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2011 9–19 32.1% #117 1,551 0 0 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2012 0–2 0.0% #229 1,530 0 0 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2013 1–2 33.3% #242 1,529 0 0 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Arantxa Parra Santonja Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 6 9 15 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2008 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2009 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2010 1 6 7 14.3% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2012 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 51 76 32.9% 38 54 92 41.3% 8 13 21 38.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Arantxa Parra Santonja Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2003 1592 108.5 -0.40 -1.77 0.819 45.6% -4 -74 — 44.7% -0.51 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.31 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2004 1590 121.3 -0.67 +1.07 0.992 50.2% -6 -71 -41 39.8% -0.88 4–7 (36%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -0.09 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2005 1530 98.6 -0.89 -1.65 0.932 48.1% -4 -9 +24 37.7% -1.22 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 102.6 +0.23 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2006 1428 86.3 -1.93 -1.02 0.878 47.6% +56 +8 — 24.0% -2.32 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.58 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2007 1414 99.2 -0.46 -1.90 0.688 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.23 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2008 1420 104.8 -0.54 +2.00 1.332 57.3% — -4 — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2009 1407 107.7 +0.34 -2.77 0.884 47.5% +45 +21 +189 23.8% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2010 1571 115.3 -0.87 -2.39 0.904 47.9% -128 +62 -7 43.9% -0.52 10–2 (83%) 2–4 (33%) 109.8 +0.29 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2011 1552 115.1 -1.10 -1.27 0.884 47.5% -147 +71 -31 34.4% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) 100.8 -1.67 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2012 1531 99.5 +1.49 -3.11 0.768 45.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.25 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2013 1530 95.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.43 1–0 — — -0.10 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 2018 1506 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1625 111.4 -0.75 -1.62 0.905 47.9% -23 +18 +16 37.4% -1.04 28–26 (52%) 22–19 (54%) 106.6 -0.68 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.