H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2004 Tashkent quarterfinal 5-7 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2004* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 5-7 6-4 6-0 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |