H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 1-1
Arantxa Parra Santonja and Nuria Llagostera Vives are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Parra Santonja won the 2010 Bastad fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2010* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Arantxa Parra Santonja | 6-4 6-3 | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Match data |
| May 7, 2005* | Rabat | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Nuria Llagostera Vives | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Nuria Llagostera Vives | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |