H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-0
Arantxa Parra Santonja holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Parra Santonja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Parra Santonja won the 2006 Australian Open first round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Arantxa Parra Santonja | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |