H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Arantxa Rus vs Camille Pin H2H: 0-1
Camille Pin holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Rus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camille Pin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Pin won the 2008 Guangzhou quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 35
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2008* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Camille Pin | 6-3 6-3 | Arantxa Rus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Rus | #183 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,788 | 89 | 163 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Camille Pin | #1,143 | #61 | 752 | 1,619 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Rus | Camille Pin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #80 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #157 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #93 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #116 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |