H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 0-2
Betsy Nagelsen holds a 2–0 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1990 Wimbledon first round 1-6 7-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Betsy Nagelsen | 1-6 7-6 9-7 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1989* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Betsy Nagelsen | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Betsy Nagelsen | #692 | #25 | 28 | 1,885 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Betsy Nagelsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,695 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #81 | 1,714 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,645 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,608 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #394 | 1,512 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,510 | 0 | 6 |