H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Fang Li H2H: 2-0
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 2–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1997 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-3 7-5 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-2 6-0 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |