H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Iva Budarova H2H: 1-0
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 1–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1987 Hamburg second round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1987* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |