H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Jo Durie H2H: 2-0
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 2–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1990 Newport final 7-6 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1990* | Newport | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 7-6 4-6 7-5 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1988* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-2 6-2 | Jo Durie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,099 | 314 | 264 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Jo Durie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 |