H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 6-2
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 6–2 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 San Diego final 3-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6
–
2
8 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1996* | San Diego | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Kimiko Date Krumm | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 7-5 6-3 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| May 20, 1995* | German Open | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-3 6-0 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-3 6-0 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1994 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-2 6-1 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-1 6-2 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1992* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Kimiko Date Krumm | 6-3 6-4 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |