H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 6-2

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 6–2 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 San Diego final 3-6 6-3 6-0.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 1996* San Diego WTA 500 F Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 3-6 6-3 6-0 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 Match data
Jun 10, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #1 7-5 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
May 20, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 QF Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #1 6-3 6-0 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Sep 8, 1994* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-3 6-0 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 SF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 2-6 6-1 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 17, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 SF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #4 6-2 6-1 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jun 2, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 6-1 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Feb 2, 1992* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 QF Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,385 708 267 72.6% 4 7 0 1 17 29
Kimiko Date Krumm 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 1988 31–15 67.4% #18 1,809 0 1
17 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,068 1 3
18 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,081 1 5 1989 6–5 54.5% 1,562 0 0
19 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,166 1 6 1990 10–7 58.8% 1,664 0 0
20 1992 59–15 79.7% #4 2,288 1 8 1991 12–11 52.2% 1,725 0 0
21 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12 1992 26–13 66.7% 1,867 0 1
22 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20 1993 25–11 69.4% 1,956 0 2
23 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,156 3 22 1994 32–12 72.7% 1,987 0 4
24 1996 52–16 76.5% #3 2,106 3 24 1995 39–12 76.5% 2,029 0 5
25 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,022 3 24 1996 31–13 70.5% 2,071 0 7
26 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,039 4 26
27 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,932 4 27
28 2000 38–18 67.9% #8 1,930 4 27
29 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,795 4 29
30 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29
37 2008 0–1 0.0% 2,042 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% 1,841 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% 1,814 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% 1,567 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% 1,454 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% 1,575 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% 1,597 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% 1,564 0 8