H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 0-1

Lilia Osterloh holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #51 7-6(4) 7-5 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #15 Match data Jun 29, 2001* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,384 720 271 72.7% 4 6 0 12 7 29
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 31–16 66.0% #18 1,785 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,065 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,080 1 5 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,167 1 6 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 1992 63–16 79.7% #4 2,283 1 8 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,167 3 22 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 1996 57–17 77.0% #2 2,117 3 24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,026 3 24 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,034 4 26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,923 4 27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2000 41–19 68.3% #9 1,932 4 27 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,796 4 29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 26 10 36 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 28 5 33 84.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 20 4 24 83.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 31 5 36 86.1% 26 7 33 78.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 27 3 30 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1994 38 5 43 88.4% 24 2 26 92.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1995 20 8 28 71.4% 21 3 24 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1996 23 8 31 74.2% 23 5 28 82.1% 6 1 7 85.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 28 8 36 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2000 22 9 31 71.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2001 15 15 30 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2002 9 13 22 40.9% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 297 118 415 71.6% 329 102 431 76.3% 57 18 75 76.0% 37 33 70 52.9% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1986 1620 109.9 — — — — -68 +75 — 57.1% +0.13 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.4 +3.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1987 1639 127.9 — — — — -145 +141 — 48.1% -0.35 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1785 156.3 — — — — -240 +150 — 67.0% +1.55 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.9 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 2066 163.2 — — — — -271 +71 -441 74.2% +1.91 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 -3.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 2080 165.6 — — — — -183 +86 -320 70.1% +1.57 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.5 -4.18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 1991 2167 175.0 — — — — -80 +84 -250 75.0% +2.29 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 103.4 -3.50 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 1992 2284 179.5 — — — — -6 +24 — 75.6% +1.86 10–8 (56%) 12–1 (92%) 107.1 -6.89 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 1993 2248 179.1 — — — — -9 +146 -280 77.4% +2.28 13–3 (81%) 8–6 (57%) 104.5 -2.91 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 1994 2334 179.3 — — — — -15 +77 -382 82.8% +2.52 12–6 (67%) 14–3 (82%) 105.3 -3.55 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 1995 2167 167.9 — — — — -23 +257 -97 73.5% +1.92 11–5 (69%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -1.09 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 1996 2117 172.0 — — — — -21 +231 +90 71.5% +1.61 13–6 (68%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -1.50 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 1997 2026 162.2 — — — — -2 +133 +231 64.2% +1.13 10–9 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +1.63 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 1998 2035 164.7 — — — — -10 +128 +215 66.4% +1.25 16–7 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 100.2 +1.13 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 1999 1924 153.3 — — — — +11 +138 +205 55.2% +0.49 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.61 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2000 1933 158.0 — — — — -18 +139 +277 62.9% +0.64 14–6 (70%) 9–0 (100%) 108.9 -1.55 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2001 1797 144.3 — — — — -25 +299 — 56.9% +0.68 12–8 (60%) 5–10 (33%) 89.3 +1.17 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2002 1635 126.7 — — — — +18 +228 — 47.0% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 92.1 +1.10 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 2385 171.0 — — — — -40 +138 -56 68.5% +1.46 151–93 (62%) 92–61 (60%) 103.1 -2.10 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.