H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 4-0

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1990 Charleston Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 6-2 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Apr 5, 1990* R32 Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 7-5 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Apr 1, 1990* QF Houston Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #18 6-1 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Apr 20, 1989* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Clay
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #26 6-2 6-1 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Apr 14, 1988* R32 Amelia Island Championships WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario — #1 3,768 2,384 720 271 72.7% 4 6 0 12 7 29
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,938 157 207 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,547 0 0
1988 31–16 66.0% #18 1,785 0 1 1980 20–13 60.6% — 1,762 0 0
1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,065 1 3 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,874 0 1
1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,080 1 5 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,793 0 1
1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,167 1 6 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1992 63–16 79.7% #4 2,283 1 8 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,704 0 2
1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2
1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,167 3 22 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1996 57–17 77.0% #2 2,117 3 24 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,026 3 24 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2
1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,034 4 26 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2
1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,923 4 27 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2
2000 41–19 68.3% #9 1,932 4 27 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,796 4 29 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2
2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Mary Lou Piatek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1986 2 2 4 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
1988 5 4 9 55.6% 26 10 36 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
1989 12 5 17 70.6% 28 5 33 84.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
1990 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2%
1991 20 4 24 83.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1992 31 5 36 86.1% 26 7 33 78.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
1993 39 9 48 81.3% 27 3 30 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
1994 38 5 43 88.4% 24 2 26 92.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
1995 20 8 28 71.4% 21 3 24 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1996 23 8 31 74.2% 23 5 28 82.1% 6 1 7 85.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1997 19 11 30 63.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1998 28 8 36 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1999 9 8 17 52.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
2000 22 9 31 71.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
2001 15 15 30 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 9 13 22 40.9% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 297 118 415 71.6% 329 102 431 76.3% 57 18 75 76.0% 37 33 70 52.9% Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 53 61 114 46.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Mary Lou Piatek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1986 1620 109.9 — — — — -68 +75 — 57.1% +0.13 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.4 +3.20 1978 1499 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
1987 1639 128.0 — — — — -145 +141 — 48.1% -0.35 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.37 1979 1547 118.3 — — — — +98 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.12
1988 1785 156.3 — — — — -239 +151 — 67.0% +1.55 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.9 -0.14 1980 1763 137.4 — — — — +9 -186 — 57.7% +0.61 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.65
1989 2066 163.2 — — — — -271 +71 -441 74.2% +1.91 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 -3.01 1981 1875 146.3 — — — — +65 -198 -301 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 100.9 -2.75
1990 2081 165.6 — — — — -183 +86 -321 70.1% +1.57 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.5 -4.19 1982 1794 142.2 — — — — +59 -196 -212 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 -0.89
1991 2168 175.0 — — — — -81 +83 -252 75.0% +2.29 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 103.4 -3.51 1983 1722 143.9 — — — — +55 -87 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -4.11
1992 2284 179.5 — — — — -5 +24 — 75.6% +1.86 10–8 (56%) 12–1 (92%) 107.1 -6.89 1984 1704 128.6 — — — — -14 — -70 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 -0.88
1993 2248 179.1 — — — — -9 +146 -280 77.4% +2.28 13–3 (81%) 8–6 (57%) 104.5 -2.91 1985 1678 113.9 — — — — -28 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +1.98
1994 2334 179.3 — — — — -14 +77 -381 82.8% +2.52 12–6 (67%) 14–3 (82%) 105.3 -3.56 1986 1619 111.1 — — — — +10 — -25 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.45
1995 2167 167.9 — — — — -23 +257 -97 73.5% +1.92 11–5 (69%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -1.09 1987 1595 117.3 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.12
1996 2118 172.0 — — — — -21 +231 +89 71.5% +1.61 13–6 (68%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -1.50 1988 1543 116.2 — — — — +33 -44 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.58
1997 2027 162.2 — — — — -3 +132 +232 64.2% +1.13 10–9 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +1.63 1989 1593 121.4 — — — — +35 -117 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.73
1998 2035 164.7 — — — — -10 +128 +211 66.4% +1.25 16–7 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 100.2 +1.12 1990 1612 125.3 — — — — +7 -86 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44
1999 1924 153.3 — — — — +11 +138 +206 55.2% +0.49 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.61 1991 1630 119.5 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69
2000 1933 158.0 — — — — -18 +139 +277 62.9% +0.64 14–6 (70%) 9–0 (100%) 108.9 -1.56 1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39
2001 1797 144.3 — — — — -25 +299 — 56.9% +0.68 12–8 (60%) 5–10 (33%) 89.3 +1.17 1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -21 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
2002 1635 126.7 — — — — +18 +228 — 47.0% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 92.1 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2385 171.0 — — — — -40 +138 -56 68.5% +1.46 151–93 (62%) 92–61 (60%) 103.1 -2.07 Career 1938 136.6 — — — — +26 -129 -156 44.3% -0.42 47–56 (46%) 21–34 (38%) 92.7 -2.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.