H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 6-0

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 6–0 lead over Naoko Sawamatsu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1997 Manhattan Beach third round 6-2 7-6.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #8 6-2 7-6 Naoko Sawamatsu #51 Match data
Jun 30, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #3 6-4 6-1 Naoko Sawamatsu #32 Match data
Sep 24, 1995* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-4 2-6 6-2 Naoko Sawamatsu #18 Match data
Jan 27, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-1 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #26 Match data
May 27, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #3 6-0 6-0 Naoko Sawamatsu #20 Match data
Sep 6, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 6-1 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,385 708 267 72.6% 4 7 0 1 17 29
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 1988 31–15 67.4% #18 1,809 0 1 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,068 1 3 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,081 1 5 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,166 1 6 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1992 59–15 79.7% #4 2,288 1 8 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,156 3 22 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1996 52–16 76.5% #3 2,106 3 24 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,022 3 24 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
26 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,039 4 26
27 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,932 4 27
28 2000 38–18 67.9% #8 1,930 4 27
29 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,795 4 29
30 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29