H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1996 Canadian Open round of 32 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-0 6-0 | Natalia Baudone | Match data | Aug 8, 1996* | R32 | Canadian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | — | #1 | 3,768 | 2,384 | 720 | 271 | 72.7% | 4 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 29 |
| Natalia Baudone | — | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,065 | 1 | 3 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,080 | 1 | 5 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,167 | 1 | 6 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 63–16 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,283 | 1 | 8 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,167 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,117 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,026 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,034 | 4 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,923 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,796 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 28 | 5 | 33 | 84.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1990 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1995 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 31 | 5 | 36 | 86.1% | 26 | 7 | 33 | 78.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 39 | 9 | 48 | 81.3% | 27 | 3 | 30 | 90.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 38 | 5 | 43 | 88.4% | 24 | 2 | 26 | 92.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 21 | 3 | 24 | 87.5% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 28 | 8 | 36 | 77.8% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 22 | 9 | 31 | 71.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 297 | 118 | 415 | 71.6% | 329 | 102 | 431 | 76.3% | 57 | 18 | 75 | 76.0% | 37 | 33 | 70 | 52.9% | Career | 21 | 29 | 50 | 42.0% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1620 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -68 | +75 | — | 57.1% | +0.13 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.4 | +3.20 | 1990 | 1502 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 1987 | 1639 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | -145 | +141 | — | 48.1% | -0.35 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.37 | 1991 | 1465 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1988 | 1785 | 156.3 | — | — | — | — | -239 | +151 | — | 67.0% | +1.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.9 | -0.14 | 1992 | 1538 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +28 | — | 44.4% | -0.67 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 1989 | 2066 | 163.2 | — | — | — | — | -271 | +71 | -441 | 74.2% | +1.91 | 8–4 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 108.7 | -3.01 | 1993 | 1578 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -6 | — | 41.5% | -0.89 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.4 | -0.23 |
| 1990 | 2081 | 165.6 | — | — | — | — | -183 | +86 | -321 | 70.1% | +1.57 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.5 | -4.19 | 1994 | 1650 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 48.7% | -0.31 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | -0.82 |
| 1991 | 2168 | 175.0 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +83 | -252 | 75.0% | +2.29 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 103.4 | -3.51 | 1995 | 1662 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -56 | — | 45.7% | -0.43 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.25 |
| 1992 | 2284 | 179.5 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +24 | — | 75.6% | +1.86 | 10–8 (56%) | 12–1 (92%) | 107.1 | -6.89 | 1996 | 1626 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -80 | — | 30.4% | -1.70 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 1993 | 2248 | 179.1 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +146 | -280 | 77.4% | +2.28 | 13–3 (81%) | 8–6 (57%) | 104.5 | -2.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2334 | 179.3 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +77 | -381 | 82.8% | +2.52 | 12–6 (67%) | 14–3 (82%) | 105.3 | -3.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 2167 | 167.9 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +257 | -97 | 73.5% | +1.92 | 11–5 (69%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.2 | -1.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 2118 | 172.0 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +231 | +89 | 71.5% | +1.61 | 13–6 (68%) | 7–6 (54%) | 99.0 | -1.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 2027 | 162.2 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +132 | +232 | 64.2% | +1.13 | 10–9 (53%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.4 | +1.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 2035 | 164.7 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +128 | +211 | 66.4% | +1.25 | 16–7 (70%) | 5–6 (45%) | 100.2 | +1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1924 | 153.3 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +138 | +206 | 55.2% | +0.49 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.8 | -0.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1933 | 158.0 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +139 | +277 | 62.9% | +0.64 | 14–6 (70%) | 9–0 (100%) | 108.9 | -1.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1797 | 144.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +299 | — | 56.9% | +0.68 | 12–8 (60%) | 5–10 (33%) | 89.3 | +1.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1635 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +228 | — | 47.0% | -0.12 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–8 (38%) | 92.1 | +1.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2385 | 171.0 | — | — | — | — | -40 | +138 | -56 | 68.5% | +1.46 | 151–93 (62%) | 92–61 (60%) | 103.1 | -2.07 | Career | 1682 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -14 | — | 42.4% | -0.76 | 13–19 (41%) | 8–12 (40%) | 97.6 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 8 | 27 | 35 | Jul 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 11 | 12 | 23 | Sep 23, 1995 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 3 | 18 | 21 | Mar 6, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 18 | 3 | 21 | Oct 7, 2000 | H2H |
| Jana Novotna | 10 | 11 | 21 | Aug 22, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Linda Wild | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 21, 1994 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 1995 | H2H |