H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 2-1
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 2–1 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1993 Essen semifinal 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1993* | Essen | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-0 6-2 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-0 3-6 6-2 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |