H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario vs Sung-Hee Park H2H: 1-0
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 1–0 lead over Sung-Hee Park in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-1 6-0 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
| Sung-Hee Park | #599 | #57 | 271 | 1,626 | 29 | 51 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Sung-Hee Park | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #233 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #111 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |