H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Elena Baltacha H2H: 1-1
Aravane Rezai and Elena Baltacha are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Baltacha leads 1–0 on grass, while Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2011 Dallas quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2011* | Dallas | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 6-2 6-2 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2011* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Elena Baltacha | 6-2 6-1 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Elena Baltacha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |