H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-1
Aravane Rezai and Katarina Srebotnik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay, while Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2008 Auckland quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2008* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 6-1 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2007* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-6(3) 3-6 7-5 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |