H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Sania Mirza H2H: 1-1
Aravane Rezai and Sania Mirza are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2010 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 6-4 6-2 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2006* | Kolkata | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 7-5 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |