H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Aravane Rezai vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 2-1

Aravane Rezai holds a 2–1 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2010 Dubai Tennis Championships first round 6-3 5-7 7-5.

France Age 39 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aravane Rezai #21 6-3 5-7 7-5 Sybille Bammer #50 Match data Feb 16, 2010* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Aravane Rezai #79 6-2 6-2 Sybille Bammer #29 Match data May 20, 2009* R32 Strasbourg Open International modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Sybille Bammer #30 6-1 7-5 Aravane Rezai #74 Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aravane Rezai #685 #15 3,100 1,881 109 117 48.2% 0 1 1 0 2 4
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aravane Rezai Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 1–2 33.3% #196 1,502 0 0
19 2006 12–6 66.7% #41 1,650 0 0
20 2007 8–21 27.6% #90 1,590 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2008 14–17 45.2% #77 1,554 0 0
22 2009 26–19 57.8% #25 1,736 0 2
23 2010 35–24 59.3% #19 1,698 0 4 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2011 12–20 37.5% #115 1,583 0 4 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2012 1–6 14.3% #171 1,546 0 4 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0
26 2013 0–2 0.0% #527 1,525 0 4 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1
28 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aravane Rezai Sybille Bammer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2006 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 2007 1 9 10 10.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 8 8 16 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 12 15 27 44.4% 17 5 22 77.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 49 61 110 44.5% 46 39 85 54.1% 13 14 27 48.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 191/226 of Aravane Rezai's and 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Aravane Rezai Sybille Bammer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 2/3 1.5 6.5 46.2% 54.2% 31.6% 45.5% 66.1% 41.9% 52.6% —/—
19 2006 5/18 3.0 5.6 59.8% 65.7% 41.9% 60.7% 56.5% 55.5% 45.9% —/—
20 2007 28/29 1.9 4.9 57.1% 61.7% 42.9% 50.2% 39.3% 53.3% 39.5% —/—
21 2008 26/31 2.3 4.9 56.6% 64.4% 44.2% 46.3% 52.5% 55.5% 41.6% —/—
22 2009 38/45 2.0 4.5 57.7% 63.7% 45.1% 48.2% 53.9% 55.6% 46.4% —/—
23 2010 51/59 3.5 5.2 58.1% 68.7% 44.5% 51.3% 46.8% 58.5% 44.9% —/—
24 2011 32/32 3.3 5.4 55.0% 64.3% 43.7% 47.9% 44.7% 55.1% 40.4% —/—
25 2012 7/7 3.6 7.1 56.7% 65.7% 41.7% 49.8% 33.8% 55.0% 33.3% 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3%
26 2013 2/2 0.5 6.5 58.4% 54.8% 32.0% 41.9% 39.7% 45.3% 48.1% 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8%
27 —/— 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2%
28 —/— 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0%
29 —/— 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1%
30 —/— 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5%
31 —/— 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0%
Career 191/226 2.7 5.1 57.0% 64.8% 43.8% 49.3% 47.5% 55.7% 42.9% 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aravane Rezai Sybille Bammer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1502 100.7 -2.58 +1.22 0.906 47.0% 37.5% -0.50 1–1 +0.06
19 2006 1651 122.8 -0.64 0.00 1.032 50.8% -30 -57 62.8% +0.60 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.8 +0.16
20 2007 1591 124.6 -1.57 -1.83 0.845 46.7% -53 +11 +13 36.4% -1.15 2–8 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 93.1 -3.23 2000 1487 99.8 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 +0.01
21 2008 1554 116.8 -0.66 -1.71 0.934 48.6% +35 -14 +14 45.7% -0.40 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 98.9 +0.98
22 2009 1737 132.6 +0.59 +1.70 1.046 51.0% -73 -16 -103 56.3% +0.42 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 103.2 -0.17
23 2010 1698 135.8 +2.03 +1.12 1.081 51.6% -82 +185 -8 59.4% +0.49 10–14 (42%) 9–6 (60%) 100.0 +1.17 2003 1474 103.1 20.0% -1.80 0–1 -0.17
24 2011 1584 111.6 -1.12 -3.06 0.901 47.9% +32 +129 +47 37.5% -0.82 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 96.3 +1.64 2004 1441 105.9 +35 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 +0.03
25 2012 1546 111.7 -1.53 -3.15 0.739 44.7% +39 23.5% -1.76 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) -0.77 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20
26 2013 1526 102.7 -1.48 +0.96 0.880 46.8% 33.3% -1.84 0–2 -0.16 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24
27 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23
28 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02
29 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49
30 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29
31 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29
36 2023 1502
Career 1881 129.7 +0.04 -0.47 0.968 49.4% -31 +56 -10 49.5% -0.14 34–51 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 99.2 -0.14 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.