H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 2-1
Aravane Rezai holds a 2–1 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2010 Dubai second round 6-3 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2010* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
| May 21, 2009* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Aravane Rezai | 6-2 6-2 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 6-1 7-5 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |