H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Vera Dushevina H2H: 1-1
Aravane Rezai and Vera Dushevina are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on clay, while Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2011 San Diego second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2011* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Vera Dushevina | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2007* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Aravane Rezai | 6-1 7-5 | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Vera Dushevina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |