H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Viktoriya Kutuzova H2H: 2-0
Aravane Rezai holds a 2–0 lead over Viktoriya Kutuzova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2009 Istanbul third round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2009* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Match data |
| May 23, 2009* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Aravane Rezai | 6-4 6-2 | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Viktoriya Kutuzova | #824 | #76 | 804 | 1,618 | 21 | 41 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Viktoriya Kutuzova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #485 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #87 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #447 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |