H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Asa Carlsson vs Jana Novotna H2H: 0-4
Jana Novotna holds a 4–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1997 Madrid fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1997* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-2 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1996* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-1 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1994* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jana Novotna | 6-2 7-5 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Asa Carlsson | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |