H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Asa Carlsson vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-1
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1995 Leipzig third round 1-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1995* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Judith Wiesner | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Asa Carlsson | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |