H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Asa Carlsson vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2
Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kimiko Date Krumm | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 20, 1994* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Kimiko Date Krumm | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Asa Carlsson | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |