H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ayumi Morita vs Abigail Spears H2H: 1-0
Ayumi Morita holds a 1–0 lead over Abigail Spears in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ayumi Morita leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ayumi Morita won the 2009 Guangzhou fourth round 1-6 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 36
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ayumi Morita | 1-6 6-1 6-0 | Abigail Spears | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 82 | 126 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Abigail Spears | #1,280 | #66 | 522 | 1,604 | 21 | 41 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Abigail Spears | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #159 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #147 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #329 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |