H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Ayumi Morita vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 1-0
Ayumi Morita holds a 1–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ayumi Morita leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ayumi Morita won the 2011 Hobart third round 3-6 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 36
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 42
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2011* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ayumi Morita | 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | Akgul Amanmuradova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 82 | 126 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,631 | 61 | 101 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |