Ayumi Morita
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Peng | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jan 4, 2013 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 4, 2012 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 10, 2013 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Ayumi Morita holds a 1–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ayumi Morita leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ayumi Morita won the 2011 Hobart International round of 32 3-6 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | Akgul Amanmuradova | Match data | Jan 13, 2011* | R32 | Hobart International | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 83 | 127 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,630 | 61 | 102 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #86 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2005 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2006 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2007 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 86 | 143 | 39.9% | 18 | 26 | 44 | 40.9% | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | — | 46 | 67 | 113 | 40.7% | 15 | 26 | 41 | 36.6% | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 194/209 of Ayumi Morita's and 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2006 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 67.9% | 62.8% | 50.9% | 47.3% | 65.1% | 58.9% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 11/12 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 59.4% | 56.3% | 47.5% | 39.8% | 47.6% | 52.8% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 14/17 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 61.8% | 54.5% | 44.0% | 46.0% | 45.0% | 50.0% | 43.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 28/31 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 63.9% | 56.7% | 43.1% | 46.5% | 49.0% | 51.7% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 25/26 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 68.1% | 58.6% | 46.8% | 47.8% | 47.3% | 54.6% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 41/45 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 67.7% | 57.3% | 46.1% | 50.7% | 50.8% | 54.0% | 43.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 26/29 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 61.4% | 57.6% | 46.3% | 48.3% | 47.0% | 52.8% | 41.2% | 2006 | 2/4 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 59.9% | 63.9% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 40.3% | 56.9% | 38.6% |
| 23 | 2013 | 39/39 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 63.4% | 59.4% | 43.3% | 47.2% | 47.5% | 53.3% | 40.1% | 2007 | 10/16 | 5.6 | 2.0 | 62.6% | 66.8% | 46.8% | 60.7% | 60.0% | 59.2% | 42.7% |
| 24 | 2014 | 7/7 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 63.3% | 50.7% | 47.6% | 43.2% | 56.7% | 49.7% | 38.0% | 2008 | 30/37 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 61.3% | 65.6% | 42.2% | 60.2% | 45.6% | 56.6% | 39.9% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 16/19 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 62.8% | 66.7% | 45.3% | 56.1% | 37.2% | 58.6% | 39.6% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26/26 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 66.9% | 64.3% | 45.4% | 50.3% | 42.3% | 58.0% | 38.7% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 22/23 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 66.6% | 59.1% | 44.4% | 39.9% | 46.2% | 54.0% | 36.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13/15 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 65.9% | 59.9% | 47.7% | 48.7% | 30.7% | 56.1% | 34.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4/5 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 62.7% | 43.8% | 59.2% | 47.1% | 57.4% | 34.0% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 75.1% | 66.8% | 43.4% | 64.6% | 31.1% | 60.7% | 39.8% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 83.8% | 38.7% | 0.0% | 33.3% | — | 32.4% | 25.0% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 55.6% | 65.7% | 32.1% | 71.4% | 0.0% | 50.8% | 28.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1494 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 1519 | 102.2 | +1.30 | +0.12 | 1.096 | 52.3% | — | — | +115 | 62.5% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 1581 | 112.6 | -1.21 | -2.90 | 0.853 | 46.9% | -27 | — | +79 | 48.1% | -0.67 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.87 | 2001 | 1482 | 95.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.19 |
| 18 | 2008 | 1594 | 118.1 | -3.04 | +0.17 | 0.867 | 47.0% | -4 | -65 | — | 38.5% | -1.36 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.2 | -0.99 | 2002 | 1472 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.07 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1509 | 112.7 | -2.81 | -2.13 | 0.851 | 46.5% | +27 | +15 | — | 40.3% | -0.48 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–4 (0%) | 95.2 | +1.33 | 2003 | 1465 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.15 |
| 20 | 2010 | 1491 | 104.6 | -1.00 | -2.22 | 0.913 | 47.8% | +2 | -13 | +95 | 40.4% | -0.56 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.1 | +1.31 | 2004 | 1451 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1581 | 128.3 | -1.15 | -0.28 | 0.944 | 48.8% | +6 | -49 | -35 | 48.5% | -0.26 | 7–10 (41%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.3 | +1.00 | 2005 | 1507 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | — | 63.2% | 0.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.89 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1539 | 121.0 | -2.33 | -2.09 | 0.874 | 47.0% | -19 | +36 | +28 | 40.4% | -0.65 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.2 | +0.05 | 2006 | 1491 | 102.4 | -0.77 | -0.65 | 0.896 | 48.1% | +3 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.33 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1572 | 122.1 | -1.70 | -2.81 | 0.859 | 46.8% | +14 | +20 | -125 | 48.8% | -0.43 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.0 | -0.02 | 2007 | 1529 | 108.8 | +0.69 | -2.00 | 1.048 | 51.1% | -9 | — | — | 48.6% | -0.28 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–1 (83%) | 102.9 | +0.73 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1573 | 103.7 | -2.70 | -1.82 | 0.755 | 44.4% | +11 | — | — | 46.2% | -1.38 | 1–0 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.21 | 2008 | 1525 | 120.6 | +0.62 | -3.54 | 0.919 | 48.6% | +1 | +77 | — | 42.2% | -0.54 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–7 (36%) | 99.4 | +0.30 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1539 | 105.7 | +1.49 | -2.51 | 0.958 | 49.4% | +41 | +3 | — | 44.2% | -0.14 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.9 | +1.76 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1579 | 116.9 | +1.35 | -3.94 | 0.921 | 48.4% | +27 | -59 | — | 44.4% | -0.28 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.1 | +1.64 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1558 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1493 | 104.0 | -1.69 | -5.44 | 0.799 | 45.4% | +59 | -23 | — | 33.3% | -1.56 | 0–4 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.6 | +0.71 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1456 | 115.4 | +0.74 | -4.35 | 0.787 | 45.2% | +39 | +29 | — | 17.2% | -1.48 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.5 | -0.79 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1483 | 113.9 | +0.82 | -2.38 | 0.797 | 46.4% | +27 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | — | — | — | -0.31 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1482 | 99.1 | +0.09 | -1.61 | 1.015 | 49.9% | +28 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.75 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1502 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1490 | 91.4 | -0.67 | -2.70 | 0.370 | 29.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1465 | 97.4 | -1.53 | -4.65 | 0.581 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.02 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1466 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1434 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1701 | 122.1 | -1.80 | -1.71 | 0.884 | 47.4% | +4 | -6 | +32 | 44.4% | -0.56 | 26–34 (43%) | 16–16 (50%) | 99.6 | +0.76 | — | 1631 | 113.1 | +0.44 | -3.64 | 0.887 | 47.7% | +22 | +13 | — | 39.5% | -0.71 | 15–21 (42%) | 22–23 (49%) | 97.8 | +3.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Peng | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jan 4, 2013 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 4, 2012 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 10, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 4, 2012 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 21, 2012 | H2H |
| Pauline Parmentier | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 1, 2011 | H2H |
| Michaella Krajicek | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 3, 2012 | H2H |
| Aravane Rezai | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 15, 2011 | H2H |