H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ayumi Morita vs Jie Zheng H2H: 1-1
Ayumi Morita and Jie Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ayumi Morita leads 1–0 on clay, while Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2012 Auckland third round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 36
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2012* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Ayumi Morita | Match data |
| May 19, 2011* | Brussels | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Ayumi Morita | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 82 | 126 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |