Ayumi Morita
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Peng | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jan 4, 2013 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 4, 2012 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 10, 2013 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Ayumi Morita vs Sania Mirza H2H: 1-2
Sania Mirza holds a 2–1 lead over Ayumi Morita in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2012 Pattaya round of 32 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Ayumi Morita | Match data | Feb 9, 2012* | R32 | Pattaya | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Ayumi Morita | 6-4 6-2 | Sania Mirza | Match data | Feb 17, 2011* | R32 | Dubai Tennis Championships | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Sania Mirza | 6-0 6-4 | Ayumi Morita | Match data | Oct 4, 2007* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 83 | 127 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,829 | 121 | 118 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #86 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #101 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 48.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2010 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27 | 14 | 41 | 65.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 86 | 143 | 39.9% | 18 | 26 | 44 | 40.9% | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 99 | 84 | 183 | 54.1% | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% | 14 | 17 | 31 | 45.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 194/209 of Ayumi Morita's and 164/236 of Sania Mirza's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2006 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 67.9% | 62.8% | 50.9% | 47.3% | 65.1% | 58.9% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 11/12 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 59.4% | 56.3% | 47.5% | 39.8% | 47.6% | 52.8% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 14/17 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 61.8% | 54.5% | 44.0% | 46.0% | 45.0% | 50.0% | 43.4% | 2005 | 11/43 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 52.3% | 64.5% | 43.1% | 56.0% | 39.5% | 54.3% | 45.0% |
| 19 | 2009 | 28/31 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 63.9% | 56.7% | 43.1% | 46.5% | 49.0% | 51.7% | 41.1% | 2006 | 21/44 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 56.7% | 61.1% | 41.3% | 46.9% | 48.2% | 52.8% | 47.4% |
| 20 | 2010 | 25/26 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 68.1% | 58.6% | 46.8% | 47.8% | 47.3% | 54.6% | 41.4% | 2007 | 39/50 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 58.8% | 65.8% | 43.0% | 54.7% | 45.2% | 56.3% | 46.4% |
| 21 | 2011 | 41/45 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 67.7% | 57.3% | 46.1% | 50.7% | 50.8% | 54.0% | 43.4% | 2008 | 18/23 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 55.2% | 63.2% | 47.3% | 46.8% | 58.1% | 56.0% | 42.6% |
| 22 | 2012 | 26/29 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 61.4% | 57.6% | 46.3% | 48.3% | 47.0% | 52.8% | 41.2% | 2009 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 55.3% | 62.2% | 44.1% | 50.7% | 47.9% | 54.1% | 46.0% |
| 23 | 2013 | 39/39 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 63.4% | 59.4% | 43.3% | 47.2% | 47.5% | 53.3% | 40.1% | 2010 | 14/15 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 56.1% | 60.7% | 43.9% | 41.3% | 42.4% | 53.3% | 45.2% |
| 24 | 2014 | 7/7 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 63.3% | 50.7% | 47.6% | 43.2% | 56.7% | 49.7% | 38.0% | 2011 | 23/23 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 56.7% | 59.6% | 38.7% | 49.8% | 52.2% | 50.3% | 46.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8/8 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 57.3% | 59.3% | 46.3% | 50.6% | 51.5% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Career | — | 194/210 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 64.4% | 57.4% | 45.3% | 47.4% | 48.7% | 53.0% | 41.5% | — | 164/239 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 56.5% | 62.5% | 43.1% | 50.2% | 48.2% | 54.1% | 45.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1494 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 1519 | 102.2 | +1.30 | +0.12 | 1.096 | 52.3% | — | — | +115 | 62.5% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.20 | 2003 | 1485 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 17 | 2007 | 1581 | 112.6 | -1.21 | -2.90 | 0.853 | 46.9% | -27 | — | +79 | 48.1% | -0.67 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.87 | 2004 | 1469 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.25 |
| 18 | 2008 | 1594 | 118.1 | -3.04 | +0.17 | 0.867 | 47.0% | -4 | -65 | — | 38.5% | -1.36 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.99 | 2005 | 1677 | 132.3 | -0.65 | +0.44 | 0.986 | 49.9% | +8 | — | -86 | 59.0% | +0.67 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +1.61 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1509 | 112.7 | -2.81 | -2.13 | 0.851 | 46.5% | +27 | +15 | — | 40.3% | -0.48 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–4 (0%) | — | +1.33 | 2006 | 1651 | 128.5 | -2.06 | +2.06 | 1.005 | 49.9% | +10 | -157 | -66 | 48.6% | +0.16 | 6–13 (32%) | 3–10 (23%) | — | -0.39 |
| 20 | 2010 | 1491 | 104.6 | -1.00 | -2.22 | 0.913 | 47.8% | +2 | -13 | +95 | 40.4% | -0.56 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +1.31 | 2007 | 1756 | 136.9 | +0.06 | +1.75 | 1.062 | 51.2% | +19 | -286 | -178 | 57.5% | +0.63 | 10–5 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.75 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1581 | 128.3 | -1.15 | -0.28 | 0.944 | 48.8% | +6 | -49 | -35 | 48.5% | -0.26 | 7–10 (41%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.00 | 2008 | 1647 | 120.3 | +0.03 | -1.09 | 0.968 | 49.5% | +46 | — | -92 | 52.0% | +0.10 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +1.20 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1539 | 121.0 | -2.33 | -2.09 | 0.874 | 47.0% | -19 | +36 | +28 | 40.4% | -0.65 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.05 | 2009 | 1719 | 122.5 | -1.13 | +1.12 | 1.002 | 50.0% | +12 | -244 | -77 | 52.9% | +0.09 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.81 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1572 | 122.1 | -1.70 | -2.81 | 0.859 | 46.8% | +14 | +20 | -125 | 48.8% | -0.43 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.02 | 2010 | 1604 | 110.7 | -1.99 | +0.10 | 0.968 | 49.2% | +28 | — | +17 | 40.5% | -0.51 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | +0.71 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1573 | 103.7 | -2.70 | -1.82 | 0.755 | 44.4% | +11 | — | — | 46.2% | -1.38 | 1–0 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.21 | 2011 | 1557 | 117.8 | -3.49 | +1.90 | 0.937 | 48.6% | +17 | -32 | — | 39.6% | -0.96 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.22 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1541 | 99.8 | -2.53 | -1.83 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +11 | — | — | 36.8% | -0.58 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.42 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1558 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1701 | 122.1 | -1.80 | -1.71 | 0.884 | 47.4% | +4 | -6 | +32 | 44.4% | -0.56 | 26–34 (43%) | 16–16 (50%) | 99.6 | +0.76 | — | 1829 | 130.7 | -1.28 | +0.98 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +17 | -150 | -87 | 51.1% | +0.13 | 43–47 (48%) | 24–25 (49%) | 98.5 | +1.30 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sania Mirza
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 4 | 1 | 5 | Aug 31, 2011 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Francesca Schiavone | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 7, 2010 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 9, 2009 | H2H |