H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ayumi Morita vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 0-1

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Ayumi Morita in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ayumi Morita
Japan Age 36 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #71 7-5 7-5 Ayumi Morita #66 Match data May 26, 2009* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ayumi Morita #1,117 #40 1,345 1,700 83 127 39.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ayumi Morita Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 0–1 0.0% #318 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 2–1 66.7% #180 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 6–6 50.0% #138 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 6–11 35.3% #86 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 10–21 32.3% #83 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 9–17 34.6% #73 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 20–25 44.4% #49 1,581 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2012 9–20 31.0% #85 1,539 0 0 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2013 18–21 46.2% #60 1,572 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2014 3–4 42.9% #248 1,573 0 0 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ayumi Morita Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 5 10 15 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 15 18 33 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 5 15 20 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 14 14 28 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 86 143 39.9% 18 26 44 40.9% 8 15 23 34.8% — — — — — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ayumi Morita Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1494 104.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1519 102.2 +1.30 +0.12 1.096 52.3% — — +115 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1581 112.6 -1.21 -2.90 0.853 46.9% -27 — +79 48.1% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1594 118.1 -3.04 +0.17 0.867 47.0% -4 -65 — 38.5% -1.36 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1509 112.7 -2.81 -2.13 0.851 46.5% +27 +15 — 40.3% -0.48 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1491 104.6 -1.00 -2.22 0.913 47.8% +2 -13 +95 40.4% -0.56 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1581 128.3 -1.15 -0.28 0.944 48.8% +6 -49 -35 48.5% -0.26 7–10 (41%) 5–4 (56%) 100.3 +1.00 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2012 1539 121.0 -2.33 -2.09 0.874 47.0% -19 +36 +28 40.4% -0.65 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 +0.05 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2013 1572 122.1 -1.70 -2.81 0.859 46.8% +14 +20 -125 48.8% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.02 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2014 1573 103.7 -2.70 -1.82 0.755 44.4% +11 — — 46.2% -1.38 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.21 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92
27 2017 1558 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
Career — 1701 122.1 -1.80 -1.71 0.884 47.4% +4 -6 +32 44.4% -0.56 26–34 (43%) 16–16 (50%) 99.6 +0.76 — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.