H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Barbara Gerken vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 1-0

Barbara Gerken holds a 1–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Gerken leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Gerken won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Gerken 6-3 6-2 Debbie Spence Nasim Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Gerken 1,650 64 97 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Debbie Spence Nasim 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Gerken Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1983 4–2 66.7% 1,565 0 0
16 1981 8–2 80.0% 1,631 0 0 1984 9–7 56.2% 1,649 0 1
17 1982 1–5 16.7% 1,578 0 0 1985 25–19 56.8% 1,777 0 1
18 1983 5–4 55.6% 1,617 0 0 1986 13–22 37.1% 1,619 0 1
19 1984 9–16 36.0% 1,581 0 0 1987 4–11 26.7% 1,554 0 1
20 1985 11–22 33.3% 1,576 0 0
21 1986 12–18 40.0% 1,564 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% 1,557 0 1
22 1987 16–19 45.7% 1,635 0 0
23 1988 2–10 16.7% 1,527 0 0
24 1989 0–1 0.0% 1,507 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Gerken Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1983 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1981 4 1 5 80.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1985 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 33 48 81 40.7% 5 13 18 27.8% 7 20 27 25.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Gerken Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1983 1565 107.6 +78 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 +0.32
16 1981 1632 123.6 +57 73.7% +1.32 1–0 2–0 +0.08 1984 1649 120.5 +26 -52 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
17 1982 1578 105.6 +37 33.3% -1.67 0–3 (0%) +0.21 1985 1777 141.5 -50 -20 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
18 1983 1618 117.4 +40 52.2% +0.91 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +1.04 1986 1619 116.9 -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
19 1984 1581 114.0 +14 +6 -7 41.2% -0.51 0–3 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +0.85 1987 1555 115.2 +10 +132 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.23
20 1985 1577 122.8 +20 -44 38.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 +0.89
21 1986 1564 106.0 +19 -88 -13 42.9% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.1 +4.32 1989 1558 101.4 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 +0.20
22 1987 1635 119.2 +37 -173 48.8% -0.23 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +2.60
23 1988 1528 96.1 +42 -126 25.9% -1.96 0–3 (0%) 0–2 +0.93
24 1989 1508 96.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.30
Career 1650 118.4 +29 -21 -60 43.5% -0.45 15–30 (33%) 12–23 (34%) 88.2 +6.97 1827 129.7 -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.