H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Gerken vs Kate Gompert H2H: 1-2
Kate Gompert holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Gerken in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1984 San Diego third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1984* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kate Gompert | 6-0 6-0 | Barbara Gerken | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbara Gerken | 6-2 6-1 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1983* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kate Gompert | 6-2 6-3 | Barbara Gerken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Gerken | — | — | — | 1,650 | 64 | 97 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Gerken | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |