Barbara Gerken
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Larisa Savchenko | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Susan Mascarin | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 13, 1986 | H2H |
| Masako Yanagi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 18, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Barbara Gerken vs Kathrin Keil H2H: 1-1
Barbara Gerken and Kathrin Keil are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Gerken leads 1–0 on clay, while Kathrin Keil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathrin Keil won the 1987 ASB Classic round of 32 2-6 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathrin Keil | 2-6 7-6 6-0 | Barbara Gerken | Match data | Jan 28, 1987* | R32 | ASB Classic | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Barbara Gerken | 7-6 6-1 | Kathrin Keil | Match data | Apr 5, 1984* | R32 | Miami Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Gerken | — | — | — | 1,650 | 64 | 97 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Gerken | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Barbara Gerken | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1981 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1986 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 48 | 81 | 40.7% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | — | 27 | 32 | 59 | 45.8% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Barbara Gerken | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1981 | 1632 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 73.7% | +1.32 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1578 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.21 | 1980 | 1600 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 64.7% | +1.29 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.44 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1618 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 52.2% | +0.91 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +1.04 | 1981 | 1616 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | — | 52.4% | -0.12 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.5 | -0.42 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1581 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +6 | -7 | 41.2% | -0.51 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.5 | +0.85 | 1982 | 1637 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -54 | — | 53.8% | +0.15 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1577 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | -44 | 38.9% | -0.56 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–6 (40%) | 96.8 | +0.89 | 1983 | 1634 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1564 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -88 | -13 | 42.9% | -0.56 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.1 | +4.32 | 1984 | 1602 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -40 | — | 42.4% | -0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.2 | +1.11 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1635 | 119.2 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | -173 | 48.8% | -0.23 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.1 | +2.60 | 1985 | 1587 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1528 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | -126 | 25.9% | -1.96 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.93 | 1986 | 1606 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | 69.2% | +1.23 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.24 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1508 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.30 | 1987 | 1631 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | -81 | 43.3% | -0.61 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.32 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1579 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 28.1% | -1.84 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -1.26 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1536 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.46 |
| Career | — | 1650 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -21 | -60 | 43.5% | -0.45 | 15–30 (33%) | 12–23 (34%) | 88.2 | +6.97 | — | 1704 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -34 | -81 | 44.9% | -0.47 | 20–16 (56%) | 14–12 (54%) | 103.5 | +0.81 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kathrin Keil
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 4, 1988 | H2H |
| Beth Herr | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Stephanie Rehe | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 14, 1988 | H2H |