H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Gerken vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1
Barbara Gerken and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Gerken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Gerken won the 1987 Tokyo Japan Open third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1987* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Gerken | 6-2 6-2 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1986* | Taipei | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Barbara Gerken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Gerken | — | — | — | 1,650 | 64 | 97 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Gerken | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |