H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 2-0

Barbara Hallquist holds a 2–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Hallquist leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1982 Sydney International round of 64 6-1 7-5.

H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 6-1 7-5 Catherine Tanvier Match data Nov 24, 1982* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Barbara Hallquist 6-3 6-3 Catherine Tanvier Match data Nov 18, 1981* R64 Perth 2 WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,778 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,801 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,827 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,778 0 0
20 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,616 0 0 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,565 0 0 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,619 0 0
23 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,703 0 0 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0
24 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,737 0 0 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,674 0 0
25 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,707 0 0 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0
26 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Catherine Tanvier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Catherine Tanvier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.78
16 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83 1981 1541 110.4 — — — — +70 +73 +7 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.05
17 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26 1982 1801 146.0 — — — — -101 -57 -142 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.01
18 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62 1983 1827 138.9 — — — — +19 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.11
19 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 1984 1779 138.5 — — — — +11 +66 -120 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.73
20 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.30 1985 1776 132.0 — — — — -9 +34 -112 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
21 1978 1616 117.7 — — — — +29 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 1986 1826 142.1 — — — — +18 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.62
22 1979 1566 114.8 — — — — +87 — -68 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.92 1987 1620 113.3 — — — — +55 +14 +54 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.21
23 1980 1704 131.6 — — — — -27 -213 -91 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.47 1988 1604 122.5 — — — — +8 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -0.94
24 1981 1737 128.5 — — — — -9 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.02 1989 1674 141.1 — — — — -10 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.88
25 1982 1708 102.3 — — — — -1 -251 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -0.55 1990 1658 111.6 — — — — -1 -82 +74 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74
26 1983 1568 105.1 — — — — +49 -96 +31 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.62 1991 1604 113.4 — — — — +31 -74 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1614 106.2 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1579 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
Career — 1778 121.7 — — — — +21 -189 -53 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.7 -0.71 — 1880 137.1 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.