H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Catrin Jexell H2H: 0-1

Catrin Jexell holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Hallquist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catrin Jexell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catrin Jexell won the 1983 Hershey round of 16 6-4 6-3.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catrin Jexell 6-4 6-3 Barbara Hallquist Match data Feb 18, 1983* R16 Hershey WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catrin Jexell 1,737 46 62 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Catrin Jexell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,516 0 0 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,474 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% 1,500 0 0 1980 6–4 60.0% 1,545 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% 1,541 0 0 1981 6–7 46.2% 1,544 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 0 1982 14–8 63.6% 1,661 0 1
20 1977 4–2 66.7% 1,577 0 0 1983 12–17 41.4% 1,648 0 1
21 1978 8–9 47.1% 1,615 0 0 1984 5–15 25.0% 1,536 0 1
22 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,564 0 0 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,490 0 1
23 1980 14–13 51.9% 1,702 0 0
24 1981 14–17 45.2% 1,736 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,477 0 1
25 1982 12–14 46.2% 1,706 0 0
26 1983 5–16 23.8% 1,567 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Catrin Jexell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1975 3 1 4 75.0% 1981 5 5 10 50.0%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 14 26 46.2% 25 25 50 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Catrin Jexell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 +80 66.7% +2.33 +0.83 1979 1474 98.1 20.0% -2.40 0–1 -0.04
17 1974 1500 97.3 +94 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +1.26 1980 1545 112.9 +51 57.1% +0.33 1–0 1–1 +0.44
18 1975 1541 102.9 +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.62 1981 1545 105.9 +71 46.9% -0.41 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 +1.08
19 1976 1530 102.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.08 1982 1661 113.2 -96 +61 -48 60.8% +0.71 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +2.02
20 1977 1578 113.0 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 +0.31 1983 1649 120.8 +19 +52 -106 43.8% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.3 +0.89
21 1978 1615 117.4 +32 -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.27 1984 1537 103.2 +36 +101 27.9% -1.35 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +1.37
22 1979 1564 114.4 +88 -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 -0.88 1985 1491 107.6 +104 +58 32.0% -0.96 1–2 (33%) +0.79
23 1980 1702 131.2 -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74
24 1981 1736 128.2 -10 -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 -2.03 1987 1477 97.7 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.16
25 1982 1707 102.0 -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61
26 1983 1567 105.0 +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68
Career 1777 121.4 +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77 1737 114.4 +17 +67 -67 44.3% -0.39 12–16 (43%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +6.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.